Academic peer review

Academic peer review

Sep 14,  · Peer review is the evaluation of scientific or academic work conducted by experts from a particular field. It is an integral part of the publication process and helps journals to publish only those articles that are consistent with their scope and quality blogger.com: Andrea Hayward Aug 21,  · The easiest and fastest way to find peer-reviewed articles is to search the online library databases, many of which include peer-reviewed journals. To make sure your results come from peer-reviewed (also called "scholarly" or "academic") journals, do the following: Read the database description to determine if it features peer-reviewed blogger.com: Marta Bladek The rigour of a peer review system ensures the quality of a research article. Academic Journals employs a rigorous peer review system. All submitted manuscripts undergo a peer review process before publication. Double Blind Peer Review

Peer review - Wikipedia

Introduction The rigour of a peer review system ensures the quality of a research article. Academic Journals employs a rigorous peer review system. All submitted manuscripts undergo a peer review process before publication. Double Blind Peer Review The review process is an important aspect of the publication process of an article. It enables authors to improve their manuscripts and aids editors in making decision on manuscripts. Academic Journals employs a double-blind peer review system.

A double-blind peer review system is an anonymous review system whereby the identity of the author s of a manuscript is concealed from the selected reviewers.

All details that may enable a reviewer to identify the author s of a manuscript are removed from the manuscript before the manuscript is sent to the reviewer. Academic Journals considers the double-blind peer system as a more effective review system because it limits possible bias from either the selected reviewers or from authors.

The first stage of the review process takes place in the editorial office, academic peer review. On submission, a manuscript is reviewed to ensure that it meets the minimum requirements of the journal before it is sent to external reviewers. At this stage, the manuscript is reviewed for the following.

Manuscripts that fails in this first stage of the review process are returned to the author s for modification and resubmission. This first stage of the review is very important as it enables the author s improve the manuscript at an early stage. This first stage of the manuscript review is usually completed within a week. Once a manuscript successfully completes the editorial office review process, it proceeds to the second stage.

The second academic peer review of the review process employs the double-blind review system. A minimum of two external reviewers are selected from our database, editorial board of the journal or other sources. These reviewers have expert knowledge of the subject area of the manuscript. The reviewers are invited to review the manuscript by sending them the abstract of the manuscript. Upon acceptance to review the manuscript, academic peer review, the full text of the manuscript is sent to the reviewers after the author s academic peer review been concealed.

Reviewers are required to evaluate the manuscripts and provide useful comments to enable the author s improve the quality of the manuscript. Reviewers also score the manuscript in terms of originality, contribution to the field, technical quality, clarity of presentation and depth of research. Finally, reviewers make one of the following suggestion about the manuscript.

It should be noted that though a reviewer may give a positive report on a particular manuscript, if another reviewer raises concerns that may fundamentally undermine the study and results the manuscript may be rejected. The total time taken to complete the second stage of the manuscript review dependent on the availability of the reviewers. However, it is usually completed between one to four weeks. Upon receipt of the revised submission, the manuscript undergoes the third and final stage of the review process, academic peer review.

The editor reviews the manuscript and makes one the following decisions. Manuscripts that are accepted as it is are scheduled for academic peer review. Manuscripts that require corrections either minor or major are sent to the author s to affect the corrections suggested by the editor.

After effecting the corrections, the editor reviews the manuscripts again before the manuscripts are accepted academic peer review publication. In some cases, the editor may academic peer review authors to make corrections a second time.

In other cases, the editor may request for the revised manuscripts with or without the additional corrections to be sent to a specific reviewer who had earlier reviewed the manuscript academic peer review the academic peer review can be accepted for publication. Authors Submit Manuscript Track Manuscript Publication Academic peer review Editorial Policies Publication Fee Waiver Policy Print Request FAQ.

Contact Us Support Center Print Request Subscribe to RSS. Reviewers Reviewers Guidelines. Editors Editors. News All News. Conferences All Conferences. About AJ Policies Memberships and Standards. Open Access Creative Commons CrossMark policy Publication Ethics Peer Review Editorial Policies Reviewers Guidelines Publication Fees Waiver Policy Digital Archiving Self-Archiving Article Copyright, academic peer review.

Peer Review Introduction The rigour of a peer review system ensures the quality of a research article. At this stage, the manuscript is reviewed for the following Possible plagiarism : The manuscript is evaluated to compare the level of similarity with other published works.

Academic Journals uses iThenticate plagiarism detection system to achieve this goal. Manuscripts that have high level of similarity with other works including the author s previous works are rejected at this stage.

Authors are provided with the similarity report together with the decision to reject the manuscript. Academic Journals is a member of SimilarityCheck. Similarity Check powered by iThenticate is an initiative of CrossRef to help its members to prevent plagiarism. Scope: After a manuscript has undergone similarity check and the level of similarity is judged to be appropriate, the content of the manuscript is checked to ensure that it fits within the scope of the journal selected by the author s.

A transferred manuscript does not automatically translate to an accepted manuscript in the receiving journal. The manuscript still undergoes the usual peer review and may be accepted or reject if it is not suitable. Recent references: Academic Journals encourage authors to cite more recent articles, academic peer review.

Preferably, considerable number of the cited articles should be works that were published within the last five years, academic peer review. This is especially important for articles submitted to journals in the life sciences. English Language: Academic Journals currently publishes full text of articles only in English language.

Abstracts may be translated to other languages and published alongside the English academic peer review abstract. Manuscripts are checked for the structure, organization, correctness and clarity of the language as it adheres to the journal's Instructions for Authors, academic peer review.

The editorial office usually makes correction to minor grammatical errors in such a manner that it does not alter the manuscript. However, in situations where language is substantially difficult to comprehend, the manuscript is returned to the author to improve clarity of academic peer review language. Finally, reviewers make one of the following suggestion about the manuscript; Requires minor corrections Requires moderate revision Requires major revision Not suitable for further processing.

In this case, academic peer review, the reviewer provides specific reason s why the academic peer review not be further processed. The editor reviews the manuscript and makes one the following decisions Accept as it is Accept with minor correction Requires major corrections Send revised manuscript for review again Reject Manuscripts that are accepted as it is are scheduled for publication.

SUBSCRIBE TO RSS.

What is Peer Review?

, time: 3:42

How to Perform a Peer Review | Wiley

Aug 21,  · The easiest and fastest way to find peer-reviewed articles is to search the online library databases, many of which include peer-reviewed journals. To make sure your results come from peer-reviewed (also called "scholarly" or "academic") journals, do the following: Read the database description to determine if it features peer-reviewed blogger.com: Marta Bladek The peer review system exists to validate academic work, helps to improve the quality of published research, and increases networking possibilities within research communities How to perform a peer review. You’ve received or accepted an invitation to review an article. Now the work begins. Here are some guidelines and a step by step guide to help you conduct your peer review. Visit The Wiley Reviewer Academy to take our free peer review training course